How many times has [2019] UKSC 44 been cited?

[2019] UKSC 44 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2019] UKSC 44

· cited by 4 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2019] UKSC 44

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Applied · 2

Cited — Dudley Metropolitan Council v Marilyn Mailley 2023-10-27
“…[2019] UKSC 44…”
Applied — National Union of Professional Foster Carers v The Certification Officer 2021-04-16
“…I need not recapitulate the well-known case-law about the extent of that power, because in Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44, [2019] ICR 1655, the Supreme Court applied it in circumstances that were substantially identical to those of the present case.…”
Cited — Drexler, R (On the Application Of) v Leicestershire County Council 2020-04-07
“…The second case is Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44; [2019] 1 WLR 5905. In that case it was held that the fact that judges would not be able to claim protection under “whistleblower” legislation on the conventio…”
Applied — Simawi v London Borough of Haringey 2019-10-31
“… was an objective justification for the difference in treatment. How does that test apply to the subject-matter of this appeal? In Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44 Lady Hale explained at [34]:…”