How many times has [2020] UKSC 17 been cited?

[2020] UKSC 17 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2020] UKSC 17

· cited by 2 · influence score 19/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2020] UKSC 17

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Applied · 1

Considered — THTN v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-10-20
“…With those factual findings in mind the F-TT considered what had been stated in AM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD [2020] UKSC 17. It set out the passage from Paposhvili v Belgium [2017] Imm AR 267 as set out at [22] of AM (Zimbabwe):…”
Applied — OA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-12-15
“… reach the level of severity required. The Upper Tribunal specifically considered the impact of Paposhvili v Belgium [2017] Imm LR 867 and AM (Zimbawbe) v SSHD [2020] UKSC 17 (which were concerned with medical/health issues) on living conditions and applied the broadened test set out in those authorities. The assessment was for the …”