UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2020] UKSC 42
[2020] UKSC 42
· cited by
2
· influence score
12
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2020] UKSC 42
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[2020] UKSC 42
Rasal Khaimah Investment Authority
Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authorit
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Rasal Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima & Ors
2023-05-15
“…[2020] UKSC 42…”
Cited
—
Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima
2021-03-12
“…t another way, any unlawful conduct by RAKIA in obtaining the emails was not central to its underlying claims against Mr Azima: compare Grondona v Stoffel & Co [2020] UKSC 42, [2020] 3 WLR 1156 concerning the defence of illegality.…”
Frequently cited alongside
[2003] 1 WLR 954
2×
[2012] 1 WLR 2004
2×
[2017] AC 1
2×
[2020] 3 WLR 1156
2×
[2020] AC 450
2×
[2003] EWCA Civ 151
2×
Dale v Banga & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 240
2×
[2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch)
2×