“…he fact that the document had never in fact been delivered would be irrelevant. As UTJ Grubb pointed out in R (Mahmood) v SSHD (effective service – 2000 Order) [2016] UKUT 57 (IAC) (“Mahmood”), such an interpretation would permit the SSHD to rely on decisions which the intended recipient had never had the opportunity to consider.…”
“…ied on the fact that the GCID recorded that the wage slips had not been submitted. He observed that in R (Mahmood) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKUT 57 (IAC) UTJ Grubb had approved the use of the GCID as a source of evidence.…”