How many times has [2001] EWHC 74 (Admin) been cited?

[2001] EWHC 74 (Admin) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] EWHC 74 (Admin)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Explained · 1Cited · 1

Explained — R. (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council 2022-02-17
“…establishing irrationality in such circumstances is high …”, citing Newsmith Stainless Ltd. v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] EWHC 74 (Admin); [2017] PTSR 1126 (paragraph 127). Paragraph 122 of the environmental statement had “explained why no assessment was being made of emissions from, for example,…”
Cited — Waterstone Estates Ltd v The Welsh Ministers 2018-07-06
“…l review grounds. It does not afford an opportunity to review the planning merits of an inspector’s decision (Newsmith v Secretary of State for the Environment [2001] EWHC 74 (Admin) at [6] per Sullivan J, and Bloor Homes at [19(3)]).…”