How many times has [2013] EWHC 1054 (Admin) been cited?

[2013] EWHC 1054 (Admin) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] EWHC 1054 (Admin)

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — The Queen (on the application of Ronald Wyatt, Chairperson of BARAD, acting in a representative capacity) v Fareham Borough Council & Ors. 2022-07-15
“…10] Env LR 33, [112]; R (Morge) v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 2, [2011] 1 WLR 268, [45] (Baroness Hale); R (Prideaux) v Buckinghamshire County Council [2013] EWHC 1054 (Admin), [2013] Env LR 32, [116]. The Judge could not be faulted in giving weight to this consideration in the present case, at para. [165] of her judgment.”…”
Cited — Plan B Earth v Secretary of State for Transport 2020-02-27
“…Buckinghamshire County Council [2013] EWHC 1054 (Admin); [2013] Env. L.R. 32, “the Secretary of State was entitled to attach great weight to the reports of [the Airports…”