“…nction, the court will apply the normal Wednesbury standard, not a heightened standard such as “anxious scrutiny” (cf. R. v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith [1996] Q.B. 517, and R. (on the application of Mahmood) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 W.L.R. 840). It is well-established that such a heightened standa…”
“…[1996] Q.B. 517 (at p.556B), the Divisional Court said that in its view, “as well as the nature of the decision under challenge, the factors upon which the degree of scrutiny …”