How many times has [2013] EWHC 211 (Admin) been cited?

[2013] EWHC 211 (Admin) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] EWHC 211 (Admin)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Jewish Rights Watch Ltd (t/a Jewish Human Rights Watch), R (On the Application Of) v Leicester City Council 2018-07-03
“…ars positively that they can have no bearing on the decision under consideration (as in R (London Borough of Lewisham) v Assessment and Qualifications Alliance [2013] EWHC 211 (Admin), [145]-[148]). But in the present context, councillors were rightly well aware that adoption of the resolution might have an impact on community relations, so …”
Cited — City Shoes (Wholesale) Ltd & Ors v The Commissioners for HMRC 2018-03-02
“…The judge also referred, at [56], to the judgment of Elias LJ (sitting with Sharp J in the Divisional Court) in R (London Borough of Lewisham) v AQA & Others [2013] EWHC 211 (Admin), [2013] ELR 281, where he said at [111]:…”