How many times has [2016] EWHC 658 (Admin) been cited?

[2016] EWHC 658 (Admin) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] EWHC 658 (Admin)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Archer, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2019-06-18
“…s in judicial review proceedings, but none of the challenges had been successful. Apart from Rowe, the cases to which the judge referred were R (Walapu) v HMRC [2016] EWHC 658 (Admin), R (Dickinson) v HMRC [2017] EWHC 1705 (Admin), [2017] 4 WLR 126, and the decisions of the High Court and this court in relation to what the judge called a “si…”
Cited — Dickinson & Ors v Revenue And Customs 2018-12-18
“…ordered; (ii) HMRC had succeeded in resisting challenges to APNs in three cases (Rowe & ors. v HMRC [2015] EWHC 2293 (Admin) (Simler J) (“Rowe”); Walapu v HMRC [2016] EWHC 658 (Admin) (Green J, as he then was) (“Walapu”) and his own decision in Vital Nut v HMRC [2016] EWHC 1797 (Admin) (“Vital Nut”); and (iii) the court should not second gue…”