- Cited — LA (Albania), R (on the application of) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) 2023-11-16
“…d to the enactment of section 11A of the 2007 Act, and address the decision dated 22 June 2011 of the Supreme Court in R(Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28; [2012] 1 AC 663 (Cart). The Upper Tribunal was designated as a “superior court of record” by section 3(5) of the 2007 Act. It had been submitted on behalf of the Secretary of …”
- Cited — AEB v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-11-18
“…two grounds but refused permission on others on the basis that they did not satisfy the second appeal test set out in R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, [2012] 1 AC 663.…”
- Cited — Hoque & Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2020-10-22
“…application for judicial review seeking to quash the decision of the UT to refuse him permission to appeal pursuant to R(Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28; [2012] 1 AC 663. The application for judicial review of the UT decision was issued on 24 July 2019. However, only brief grounds for review were submitted at that stage as it w…”
- Cited — Archer, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2019-06-18
“… see, for example, Kayv Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, at [30] per Lord Bingham, and R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, [2012] 1 AC 663, at [33] per Lord Phillips.…”
- Cited — Faqiri, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-02-18
“…However, in R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28; [2012] 1 AC 663 (“Cart”) the Supreme Court confirmed that such decisions are amenable to judicial review, and set out the test by which applications for permission to proceed …”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v The Office of Communications 2018-11-14
“… 1536 (Civ) at paragraph 357, Cooke v. Secretary of State for Social Security [2001] EWCA Civ. 734 per Hale LJ at paragraph 16, Regina (Cart) v. Upper Tribunal [2012] 1 AC 663, [2011] UKSC 28; Regina (Jones) v. First Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) [2013] UKSC 19; [2013] 2 AC 48 per Lord Carnwath at paragraph 41).…”