UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2017] EWHC 2378 (Admin)
[2017] EWHC 2378 (Admin)
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2017] EWHC 2378 (Admin)
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[2017] EWHC 2378 (Admin)
Dill v The Secretary of State for
Hussain v General Pharmaceutical C
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Dill v The Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor
2018-11-26
“…The application and appeal were heard together by Singh J (as he then was), who refused both on all grounds ([2017] EWHC 2378 (Admin)).…”
Cited
—
Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1)
2018-01-18
“…) “a plain breach of natural justice”. Singh J (as he then was) touched on this area recently in Dill v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 2378 (Admin), a planning case. His judgment included this:…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1985] 1 AC 461
1×
[1987] AC 396
1×
[1997] 1 WLR 1447
1×
[1997] 1 WLR 168
1×
[1999] 2 AC 143
1×