Is it still good law? ⚠️ This case has negative treatment (1 citation(s): e.g. doubted / not followed / overruled). Check carefully before relying on it.
How to cite
[2020] EWHC 38 (Admin)
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
“… to have been treated in some of the cases as an independent requirement for the discretion (or duty) to arise (see for example Gupta v General Medical Council [2020] EWHC 38 (Admin)(“Gupta”) at [58] to [60]). Fordham J in Rakoczy [21(ii)], on the other hand, appears to have doubted that it was. There he stated that it was not “laying down …”
“…oach should be contrasted with the approach he has subsequently taken to a sexual misconduct case in another section 40 appeal: Gupta v General Medical Council [2020] EWHC 38 (Admin). This was an appeal by a doctor, resulting from the sanction of erasure which followed a conviction for the possession of extreme pornography and prohibited im…”