How many times has [2002] CAT 1 been cited?

[2002] CAT 1 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] CAT 1

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] CAT 1

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Considered · 1

Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Anor (Rev 3) 2020-03-10
“…[2002] CAT 1 (“…”
Considered — The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Ors 2019-10-04
“…edings under the Act are “criminal” and that this is a reason to refuse permission: see NAPP Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v Director General of Fair Trading [2002] CAT 1, paragraphs 98 – 99. I do not consider this to be relevant. The nature of the argument sought to be advanced is unaffected by its characterisation as “criminal…”