How many times has Case C-177/16 been cited?

Case C-177/16 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

Case C-177/16

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Case C-177/16

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Anor (Rev 3) 2020-03-10
“…Case C-177/16 Autoriesbu un Komunicesanas Konsultaciju Agentura / Latvijas Autoru Apvieniba v Konkurences Padome (6th April 2017) (“Latvian Copyright”)…”
Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Anor (Rev 3) 2020-03-10
“…(Case C-177/16) (“…”
Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Ors 2019-10-04
“…proof and the principle of respect for the presumption of innocence. Moreover, it accorded with the approach adopted by Advocate General Wahl in his opinion in Case C-177/16 Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra / Latvijas Autoru apvienība EU:C:2017:286 (“Latvian Copyright”) at paragraphs [124] - [128].…”