How many times has [2022] CAT 31 been cited?

[2022] CAT 31 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2022] CAT 31

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2022] CAT 31

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha & Ors v Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited 2023-12-08
“…e Fee Umbrella Proceedings [2022] CAT 50 (“MIF”) at paragraphs [4] - [22]. The question was whether Mastercard was entitled to appeal the substantive decision ([2022] CAT 31) on grounds concerning the extent of disclosure and witness evidence relevant to the issue of merchant pass-on. The CAT held that whilst there was jurisdiction…”
Cited — Phillip Gwyn James Evans v Barclays Bank PLC & Ors 2023-11-09
“…e Fee Umbrella Proceedings [2022] CAT 50 (“MIF”) at paragraphs [4] - [22]. The question was whether Mastercard was entitled to appeal the substantive decision ([2022] CAT 31) on grounds concerning the extent of disclosure and witness evidence relevant to the issue of merchant pass-on. The CAT held that whilst there was jurisdiction…”