- Cited — Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha & Ors v Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited 2023-12-08
“… 1196; Mastercard Inc v Merricks [2020] UKSC 51, [2021] 3 All ER 285; Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, [2022] AC 1217; Le Patourel v BT Group PLC and another [2022] EWCA Civ 593, [2023] 1 All ER (Comm) 667; LSER and others v Gutmann [2022] EWCA Civ 1077, [2022] ECC 26; MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd and others v Mark McLaren Class Representat…”
- Cited — Phillip Gwyn James Evans v Barclays Bank PLC & Ors 2023-11-09
“…[2022] EWCA Civ 593…”
- Cited — UK Trucks Claim Limited v Stellantis NV (formerly Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV) & Ors 2023-07-25
“…at the same time as the present judgment), the present case was heard by the CAT before the guidance of this Court in BT Group plc v Le Patourel (“Le Patourel”)[2022] EWCA Civ 593; [2022] Bus LR 660 (handed down on 6 May 2022) and London & South Eastern Railway Limited v Gutmann (“Gutmann”) [2022] EWCA Civ 1077 (handed down on 28 July 20…”
- Cited — MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd & Ors. v Mark McLaren Class Representative Ltd 2022-12-21
“…eals on a “point of law”: Section 47 CA 1998. The judgments in Merricks v Mastercard Inc [2020] UKSC 51 (“Merricks”) and Le Patourel v BT Group PLC and another [2022] EWCA Civ 593 (“Le Patourel”) at paragraphs [50] – [57] have provided guidance as to the identification of points of law over which the Court has jurisdiction. All the issue…”
- Cited — Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks 2022-11-29
“…In the recent decision of this Court in BT Group Plc v Le Patourel [2022] EWCA Civ 593; [2022] Bus LR 660 at [36] Green LJ stated that: “Any Order made under the Rules must take into account the “General Principles” set out in Rule 4.”…”
- Considered — London & South Eastern Railway Limited & Ors v Justin Gutmann 2022-07-28
“…le LLC [2021] UKSC 50 (“Lloyd”). The system, as interpreted by those judgments, was considered in a judgment of this Court in BT Group plc v Justin Le Patourel [2022] EWCA Civ 593 at paragraphs [24] - [44] (“Le Patourel”). There is no need to repeat here what has been thoroughly rehearsed in these earlier cases. It suffices to highlight …”