How many times has [1896] 2 QB 59 been cited?

[1896] 2 QB 59 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1896] 2 QB 59

· cited by 2 · influence score 16/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1896] 2 QB 59

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Chudley & Ors v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) 2019-03-06
“…Mr Cogley QC relied in that regard on a passage in the judgment of Lord Russell of Killowen CJ in Gillespie Brothers v Cheney Eggar [1896] 2 QB 59 at 62:…”
Cited — Navig8 Chemicals Pool Inc v Glencore Agriculture BV 2018-08-21
“…He referred in this context to the observations of Lord Russell of Killowen CJ, sitting at first instance, in Gillespie Brothers & Co v. Cheney Eggar & Co [1896] 2 QB 59 at 62:…”