How many times has [1918] AC 888 been cited?

[1918] AC 888 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1918] AC 888

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1918] AC 888

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts 2023-02-15
“…aud unravels all: “A judgment that is tainted and affected by fraudulent conduct is tainted throughout…” (per Lord Brunswick in Hip Foong Hong v H Neroira & Co [1918] AC 888 at 894, cited with approval recently by Lord Kerr in Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13; [2020] AC 450 at [45]). However, this broad mantra ne…”
Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“… bringing a fresh action seeking the equitable relief of setting aside the judgment – see Flower v Lloyd [1877] 6 Ch D 297; Hip Foong Hong v H Neotia & Company [1918] AC 888.…”