How many times has [1933] AC 289 been cited?

[1933] AC 289 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1933] AC 289

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1933] AC 289

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“…conflicting expert testimony: see A/S Tallinna Laevauhisus v Estonian State Steamship Line (1946) 80 Ll L Rep 99 at 107; Lazard Brothers & Co v Midland Bank Ltd[1933] AC 289 at 298; and Dallah Estate and Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Government of Pakistan[2009] EWCA Civ 755, [2010] 2 WLR 805 at par…”
Cited — Ukraine v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc (Rev 1) 2018-09-14
“…at of Lord Wright giving the only reasoned judgment, with which the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed, in Lazard Brothers & Co v Midland Bank Ltd [1933] AC 289 at 297:…”