How many times has [1995] 1 WLR 978 been cited?

[1995] 1 WLR 978 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1995] 1 WLR 978

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1995] 1 WLR 978

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“…In Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust plc (No 3) [1995] 1 WLR 978, shares in Berlitz, a company incorporated in New York, which were held by Bishopsgate as nominee for Macmillan were wrongfully used to secure loans to the Max…”
Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“…“As is pointed by Millett LJ when sitting at first instance at Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Trust (No 3)[1995] 1 WLR 978 at page 989 (commenting on Norris v Chambres (1891) 29 Beavan, 246, affirmed 3 De Gex Fisher and Jones 583), where a plaintiff invokes the in personam jurisdic…”