How many times has [1953] 2 QB 198 been cited?

[1953] 2 QB 198 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1953] 2 QB 198

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1953] 2 QB 198

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Explained · 2

Explained — Blacklion Law LLP v Amira Nature Foods Ltd & Anor 2023-06-15
“…r Goddard LJ and Francis Jackson Developments Ltd v Stemp [1943] 2 All ER 601, 602-603) or by making an order on a false hypothesis of fact: see Whall v Bulman [1953] 2 QB 198, as explained by Diplock LJ in Oscroft v Benabo [1967] 1 WLR 1087, 1099F-G. The second is where the county court has enforced an illegal contract: see Snell v …”
Explained — Golding v Martin 2019-03-15
“…er Goddard LJ and Francis Jackson Developments Ltd v Stemp [1943] 2 All ER 601, 602603) or by making an order on a false hypothesis of fact: see Whall v Bulman [1953] 2 QB 198, as explained by Diplock LJ in Oscroft v Benabo [1967] 1 WLR 1087, 1099F-G. The second is where the county court has enforced an illegal contract: see Snell v …”