How many times has [1953] AC 11 been cited?

[1953] AC 11 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1953] AC 11

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1953] AC 11

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) v Central Bank of Venezuela & Ors 2023-06-30
“…Mr Fulton submitted that the timing argument was entirely wrong and was inconsistent with the approach in Gdynia-Ameryka LinievBoguslawski [1953] AC 11 (“Gdynia”), affirming the Court of Appeal decision in that case at [1951] 1 KB 162, and Civil Air Transport Inc v Central Air Transport Corp [1953] AC 70 (PC) …”
Cited — "Maduro Board" of the Central Bank of Venezuela v "Guaido Board" of the Central Bank of Venezuela 2020-10-05
“…Boguslawski [1953] AC 11 at 45 when he said that “Apart from the distinction between recognition de jure and recognition de facto which does not affect this case, we cannot recognise t…”