- Considered — Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) v Central Bank of Venezuela & Ors 2023-06-30
“…The judge considered the House of Lords decision in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler (No.2) [1967] 1 AC 853 (“Carl Zeiss”), the decision of Gross J in Air Foyle v Center Capital [2003] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 753 (“Air Foyle”), the Privy Council decision in Pattni v Ali [2006]…”
- Cited — Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) v Central Bank of Venezuela & Ors 2023-06-30
“…erstanding of the foreign court’s procedure and whether a particular issue was decided or obiter (referring to Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853 at p.918, per Lord Reid). However, any difficulty in application does not affect the test laid down by the Supreme Court. It also seems to me that some areas o…”
- Cited — Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive (trading as Nexus) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers & Anor. 2022-10-27
“…here “in effect, he represents the party in the first action” and refers to the example given by Lord Reid in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (no. 2) [1967] 1 AC 853 (see pp. 911-912) of a case where the first action is brought by a servant or agent of the claimant in the second.…”
- Applied — CTD (A Child: Rehearing) 2020-10-14
“… erroneous; and (d) the court's discretion, like the rules of issue estoppel, as pointed out by Lord Upjohn in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No.2) [1967] 1 AC 853, 947, "must be applied so as to work justice and not injustice."…”
- Cited — "Maduro Board" of the Central Bank of Venezuela v "Guaido Board" of the Central Bank of Venezuela 2020-10-05
“…ognising Mr Guaidó as President de jure, it left no room for any recognition of a rival de facto President. Citing Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853, the Guaidó Board submitted that a statement of recognition de jure necessarily carried with it recognition de facto unless, alongside a statement of recogniti…”
- Cited — Mohamed v Breish & Ors 2020-05-15
“…This passage was cited with approval by Lord Reid in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler (No2) [1967] 1 AC 853 at p. 905B.…”
- Applied — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“…(No.2) [1967] 1 AC 853, 947, “must be applied so as to work justice and not injustice.”…”
- Cited — Lachaux v Lachaux 2019-05-01
“…It is well-established that a foreign judgment can create an issue estoppel: e.g. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853 and The Sennar (No 2) [1985] 1…”