UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [1956] AC 736
[1956] AC 736
· cited by
2
· influence score
14
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[1956] AC 736
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[1956] AC 736
TN (Vietnam) & Anor, R. (On the Ap
Guled, R (On the Application Of) v
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Guled, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
2019-02-12
“…In Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council [1956] AC 736 (hereafter, “East Elloe”) the House of Lords held that the jurisdiction of the courts had been ousted by a statutory provision which prohibited any challenge t…”
Cited
—
TN (Vietnam) & Anor, R. (On the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
2018-12-19
“…In Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council [1956] AC 736, at 769 Lord Radcliffe said:…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1969] 2 AC 147
2×
[1999] 2 AC 143
2×
[2012] EWCA Civ 842
2×
[2014] EWHC 2245 (Admin)
1×
[2014] EWHC 2525 (Admin)
1×
[2015] EWHC 1689 (Admin)
1×