- Cited — Denaxe Limited v Paul Cooper & Anor 2023-06-30
“…[1964] P 181, 197–198.…”
- Cited — Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive (trading as Nexus) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers & Anor. 2022-10-27
“…vised to describe this principle by Higgins J in Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1921) 29 CLR 537, 561 and adopted by Diplock LJ in Thoday v Thoday [1964] P 181, 197-198. Fifth, there is the principle first formulated by Wigram V-C in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, 115, which precludes a party from raising in…”
- Cited — Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive (trading as Nexus) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers & Anor. 2022-10-27
“…licy, nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa. The determination of the issue between the parties gives rise to what I ventured to call in Thoday v Thoday [1964] P 181, 198, an ‘issue estoppel’.”…”
- Cited — Unite the Union v Alec McfAdden 2021-02-19
“…vised to describe this principle by Higgins J in Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1921) 29 CLR 537, 561 and adopted by Diplock LJ in Thoday v Thoday [1964] P 181, 197–198. Fifth, there is the principle first formulated by Wigram V-C in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, 115, which precludes a party from raising in…”
- Cited — Salix Homes v Mantato 2019-03-20
“…vised to describe this principle by Higgins J in Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1921) 29 CLR 537, 561 and adopted by Diplock LJ in Thoday v Thoday [1964] P 181, 197–198. Fifth, there is the principle first formulated by Wigram V-C in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, 115, which precludes a party from raising in…”
- Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“…on because it would be “useless and vexatious” to subject the defendant to another suit for the purpose of obtaining the same result - see also Thoday v Thoday [1964] P 181 at 197–198 per Diplock LJ, and Republic of India v India Steamship [1993] A.C. 410 at 417 per Lord Goff.…”