- Cited — Kuznetsov v Amazon Services Europe SARL 2019-06-11
“…diction to set aside final orders. These issues are still not fully resolved, see: Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 at [50] to [54]; Hackney LBC v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 at [18] to [25]; Terry v BCS Acceptances and others [2018] EWCA Civ 2422 at [75] and Salekipour v Parma [2018] EWCA Civ 2141 at [61] to [69]. Those questions a…”
- Cited — Salix Homes v Mantato 2019-03-20
“…on in the present case was governed by the approach of the court in Forcelux Ltd v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854, [2010] HLR 20, rather than Hackney LBC v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8, [2011] HLR 15.…”
- Applied — Golding v Martin 2019-03-15
“…o that would not, in our judgment, serve the overriding objective; particularly where CPR Part 39.3 (5) is only being applied by analogy: Hackney LBC v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8, [2011] HLR…”
- Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“…ossession orders made when the defendant did not attend the hearing where CPR 39.3 may be relied upon by analogy – see Hackney London Borough Council v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8, [2011] HLR 15. Another example is the use of powers akin to CPR 3.1(7) to vary or revoke financial orders made in family proceedings in relation to which ther…”