How many times has [1967] 2 AC 134 been cited?

[1967] 2 AC 134 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1967] 2 AC 134

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1967] 2 AC 134

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Followed · 1

Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“…where their interest and duty conflict, by dealing with the company in their own interest: Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 and Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134; and…”
Followed — Recovery Partners GP Limited & Anor. v Irakli Rukhadze & Ors. 2023-03-21
“…In Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 at pp.144G-145A Lord Russell explained the all-embracing nature of a fiduciary’s liability to account for profits as follows:…”
Cited — Parr v Keystone Healthcare Ltd & Ors 2019-07-16
“…The fundamental principle is best expressed by Lord Russell in Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134:…”