- Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“…was “an unnecessary complication” and inconsistent with Millett LJ’s exposition of the nature of fiduciary duties in Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1: “Whether viewed as duties or disabilities”, Mummery LJ said, “all such incidents are aspects of the fiduciary’s primary obligation of loyalty”.…”
- Cited — UK Trucks Claim Limited v Stellantis NV (formerly Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV) & Ors 2023-07-25
“…t least one and preferably both of its principals. Mr Thompson KC relied on the judgment of Millett LJ in Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew (“Mothew”) [1998] Ch 1 at 18H-19H.…”
- Followed — Tulip Trading Limited (a Seychelles company) v Wladimir Jasper van der Laan & Ors. 2023-02-03
“…The classic definition of a fiduciary was set out by Millett LJ in the following passage from Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew[1998] Ch 1 at 18A-C:…”
- Cited — Darya Belsner v Cam Legal Services Limited 2022-10-27
“…[1998] Ch 1 (…”
- Cited — Wood v Commercial First Business Ltd & Ors 2021-03-31
“…the nature of a fiduciary relationship, with references to the well-known passage from the judgment of Millett LJ in Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 at 18, a passage from the judgment of Mason J in the High Court of Australia in Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 at…”
- Cited — Secretariat Consulting PTE Ltd & Ors v A Company 2021-01-11
“…[1998] Ch 1…”
- Cited — Parr v Keystone Healthcare Ltd & Ors 2019-07-16
“…e were supplied with print outs and handed down transcripts of authorities that have been reported in the official law reports (e.g. Bristol & West BS v Mothew [1998] Ch 1; A-G v Blake [2001] 1 AC 280; Stein v Blake (No 2) [1998] 1 All ER 724). Unreported cases were cited for propositions that could be found in reported ones. The…”
- Explained — Staechelin & Ors v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd & Ors 2019-05-14
“…al is that of loyalty. It is not a duty to exercise skill and care. As Millett LJ explained in his seminal judgment in Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1, 18 a servant who loyally does his incompetent best is not guilty of a breach of fiduciary duty. On the judge’s findings, Mr de Pury was not disloyal. He loyal…”
- Cited — Medsted Associates Ltd v Canaccord Genuity Wealth (International) Ltd 2019-02-06
“…Mr Malek also relied on the well-known statement of a fiduciary’s duty by Millett LJ in Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 at page 18:-…”
- Cited — Eze v Conway & Anor 2019-02-06
“…[1998] Ch 1…”
- Considered — Farrar v Miller 2018-02-14
“… duties, and in answering that question it is often helpful to consider whether, to adopt the words of Millett LJ in Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 at 18, one joint venturer has undertaken to act for or on behalf of the other in a particular matter or circumstances which have given rise to a relationship o…”