How many times has [1971] 1 WLR 1239 been cited?

[1971] 1 WLR 1239 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1971] 1 WLR 1239

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1971] 1 WLR 1239

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Dyson Technology Limited v Channel Four Television Corporation 2023-07-25
“…he course of his review the judge referred to a number of authorities including Knupffer v London Express [1944] AC 116 (“Knupffer”); Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1239 (“Morgan v Odhams Press”) and an Australian case Palace Films Party Limited v Fairfax Media Publications Limited [2012] NSWSC 1136 (“Palace Films”). In paragra…”
Cited — Economou v De Freitas 2018-11-21
“…e pointed out, it is the law that the words can defame someone even if he or she is not the direct focus of what is said: see for example Morgan v Odhams Press [1971] 1 WLR 1239at 1243 and Cassidy v Daily Mirror [1929] 2KB 331 at 338-9. The judge decided this was the position here: each of the publications complained of implied somethi…”