How many times has [1980] A.C. 74 been cited?

[1980] A.C. 74 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1980] A.C. 74

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1980] A.C. 74

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v Jason Wilkes 2022-12-07
“…rmine the meaning of the enactment would cross the boundary between construction and legislation: see per Lord Diplock in Jones v. Wrotham Park Settled Estates [1980] A.C. 74, 105–106 ….…”
Cited — The Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (GEMA) v R (SSE Generation Limited & Ors) (SSE) 2022-11-08
“…[1980] A.C. 74, 105. In the present case these three conditions are fulfilled.…”
Cited — Livewest Homes Limited (Formerly Known As Laverty Limited) v Sarah Bamber 2019-07-10
“…rmine the meaning of the enactment would cross the boundary between construction and legislation: see per Lord Diplock in Jones v. Wrotham Park Settled Estates [1980] A.C. 74, 105–106. In the present case these three conditions are fulfilled.…”