How many times has [1992] 2 AC 386 been cited?

[1992] 2 AC 386 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1992] 2 AC 386

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1992] 2 AC 386

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Avondale Park Limited v Miss Delaney's Nursery Schools Limited 2023-06-07
“… of the void lease, except where they are inconsistent with a periodic tenancy. As Lord Templeman put it in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386, 392:…”
Cited — Anixter Ltd v the Secretary of State for Transport 2020-01-30
“…tion of section 24 a tenancy for an indefinite term would not be one that was recognised by the common law: Prudential Assurance co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386.…”
Cited — Livewest Homes Limited (Formerly Known As Laverty Limited) v Sarah Bamber 2019-07-10
“…aximum term is uncertain. After some judicial debate on this topic, it was settled by the House of Lords in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386 that (as per Lord Templeman [at 394]):…”