- Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“…Searching for analogies, Mr de Garr Robinson referred us to Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd (Nos. 1 and 2) [1980] Ch 515 (“Bartlett”). In Bartlett, a trust had held almost all the shares in a property company (“BTL”) which had embarked on a policy of speculative development. In p…”
- Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“…as a result of one breach of duty while ignoring a gain obtained as a result of another breach of duty. In Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd (Nos. 1 and 2) [1980] Ch 515, Mr Justice Brightman said that:…”
- Cited — Watson v KEA Investments Ltd 2019-10-23
“…The general rule was that interest was awarded at 4% simple (as in Alford; see Bartlett v Barclays Bank plc (No.2) [1980] Ch 515 at 546G).…”
- Cited — Watson v KEA Investments Ltd 2019-10-23
“…The next case to which I should refer is Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co. Ltd. [1980] Ch 515. This was a case where a professional trustee had permitted a company in which it was a majority shareholder to invest in property development of a speculative…”
- Cited — Watson v KEA Investments Ltd 2019-10-23
“…In Bartlett v. Barclays Bank Trust Co. Ltd. (No. 2) [1980] Ch. 515, 547 Brightman J. was of the opinion that a proper rate of interest to be awarded, in the absence of special circumstances, to compensate beneficiaries and tru…”
- Cited — P&P Property Ltd v Owen White & Catlin LLP 2018-05-15
“…ee, but also upon the beneficiaries: see Marsden v Regan [1954] 1 All ER 475, [1954] 1 WLR 423, per Evershed MR at 434; and Bartlett v Barclays Trust Co (No 1) [1980] Ch 515, [1980] 1 All ER 139, [1980] 2 WLR 430, per Brightman J at 538A. Furthermore, s 61 makes it clear that even if the trustee ought fairly to be excused, the cour…”
- Applied — Ahmed & Ors v Ingram & Anor 2018-03-19
“… re Dawson, deed.; Union Fidelity Trustee Co. Ltd. v. Perpetual Trustee Co. Ltd. [1966] 2 N.S.W.R. 211; Bartlett v. Barclays Bank Trust Co. Ltd. (Nos. I and 2) [1980] Ch. 515. Thus the common law rules of remoteness of damage and causation do not apply. However there does have to be some causal connection between the breach of trust…”