- Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“…With regard to the assistance element of a claim for dishonest assistance, Lord Millett pointed out in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12, [2002] 2 AC 164 (“Twinsectra”), at paragraph 107, that liability:…”
- Cited — Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Joseph Ruhan & Anor 2023-10-04
“…eld by the fiduciary on constructive trust is liable for that dishonest assistance: see [277] above and also Lord Millett’s comment in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164, [107], that liability for dishonest assistance:…”
- Cited — Stanford International Bank Ltd v HSBC Bank Plc 2021-04-15
“…The judge actually suggested in error that Lord Scott had said this in TwinsectraLtd v. Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164.…”
- Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…House of Lords in Twinsectra Limited v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12, [2002] 2 AC 164 (“Twinsectra”). With the benefit of hindsight, it can be seen that this case temporarily clouded, although it did not ultimately obscure, the picture painted s…”
- Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…nly suspect, that he is assisting in a misappropriation of money without knowing that the money is held on trust or what a trust means: see the Twinsectra case [2002] 2 AC 164, para 19 (Lord Hoffmann) and para 135 (Lord Millett). And it was not necessary to know the “precise involvement” of Mr Cramer in the group’s affairs in order t…”
- Considered — First City Monument Bank Plc v Zumax Nigeria Ltd 2019-03-01
“…The basis of Quistclose trusts was considered by Lord Millett in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12, [2002] 2 AC 164. He concluded that such atrust involves a resulting trust coupled with a power. He said at paragraph 100:…”
- Cited — P&P Property Ltd v Owen White & Catlin LLP 2018-05-15
“…o hold the purchase money and the vendor’s solicitor as agent is under a fiduciary duty to observe and give effect to those terms: see Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 at [76].…”