- Cited — Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors 2021-02-01
“…[1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 132; and the court’s power is only used where justice and public policy demand it, see Lord Hoffmann in the Arthur J S Hall case.…”
- Cited — Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP v BTI 2014 LLC 2021-01-11
“… issues that have been decided in prior proceedings. However, there is no prima facie assumption that such proceedings amount to an abuse, see Bragg v. Oceanus [1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 132; and the court's power is only used where justice and public policy demand it, see Lord Hoffmann in the Arthur Hall case.…”
- Cited — Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP v BTI 2014 LLC 2021-01-11
“… unsuccessfully to have a joint trial of the two claims, which was resisted by both sets of defendants. He relied upon the dictum of Kerr LJ in Bragg v Oceanus [1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 132 at 138:…”
- Cited — Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP v BTI 2014 LLC 2021-01-11
“… rare or exceptional case that the court will find that the second proceedings are an abuse of process: see for example per Sir David Cairns in Bragg v Oceanus [1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 132 at 138-9, per Lord Hobhouse at [26] In re Norris [2001] 1 WLR 1388, per…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor v Koza Altin Isletmeleri AS 2020-07-31
“…o issues that have been decided in prior proceedings. However, there is no prima facie assumption that such proceedings amount to an abuse: see Bragg v Oceanus [1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 132; and the court's power is only used where justice and public policy demand it, see Lord Hoffmann in the Arthur J S Hall case.…”