“…failed to have regard to a factor that was relevant, or if the judge’s discretion was “clearly wholly wrongly exercised”: see Eagil Trust Co Ltd v Pigott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119 and Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance PLC v T&N Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1964, at [38] and [47].”…”
“…]here is no duty on a judge, in giving his reasons, to deal with every argument presented by counsel in support of his case” (Eagil Trust Co Ltd v Pigott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119, at 122, per Griffiths LJ) and it is not the case that “every factor which weighed with the judge in his appraisal of the evidence has to be identified and exp…”