- Cited — U3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-07-14
“…ests of national security was not ‘surrendered to’ the Secretary of State. He referred to Lord Scarman’s analysis in Chandler v Director of Public Prosecutions [1985] AC 374, 406. That analysis showed that SIAC served ‘at least three important functions’ (my emphasis) which were necessitated by Chahal. First, ‘the factual basis for…”
- Cited — Kanu, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs 2023-07-07
“…the exercise of the prerogative. Under the latter heading they cited the “landmark” GCHQ case (Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374) and, among other cases, the decision in R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex p Everett [1989] 1 QB 811.…”
- Cited — The Good Law Project, R (on the application of) v The Prime Minister & Ors 2022-12-01
“…[1985] AC 374 at 408 should be regarded as definitive in modern public law. Lord Diplock had said that a decision must have “consequences which affect some person (or body o…”
- Applied — End Violence Against Women Coalition, R (On the Application Of) v Director of Public Prosecutions 2021-03-15
“…cision was so unreasonable that no reasonable decision maker would ever consider making it; or as Lord Diplock put it in CCSU v. Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 at 410G the decision was “so outrageous in its defiance of logic or of accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the questio…”
- Applied — Taj, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-01-20
“…ards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question could have arrived at it (Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the CivilService [1985] AC 374 at 410).”…”
- Cited — MP, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Health And Social Care 2020-12-03
“…In Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (“CCSU”), which concerned the imposition of a bar on trade union membership for staff at GCHQ, Lord Fraser observed at 401 that legitimate expectation “may ari…”
- Cited — Heathrow Hub Ltd & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Transport 2020-02-27
“… of the modern doctrine of legitimate expectation lies in the decision of the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Union v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (“CCSU”). That was a case concerning a procedural expectation (a suggested duty to consult), but the fundamental ingredients of a legitimate expectation will b…”
- Followed — Save Britain's Heritage, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors 2018-10-04
“…practice, even where there has been no promise or assurance that a particular procedure will be followed: see for example CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374. It is common ground that legitimate expectation can arise (in either way) in the planning context: see R (Majed) v London Borough of Camden [2009] EWCA Civ 10…”
- Cited — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…h a change was judicially canvassed for the first time in this jurisdiction by Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374, 410E, and it has been mentioned by various judges in a number of subsequent cases – often with some enthusiasm, for instance by Lord Slynn in R (Alconbury Dev…”