How many times has [1987] 1 WLR 1676 been cited?

[1987] 1 WLR 1676 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1987] 1 WLR 1676

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1987] 1 WLR 1676

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Business Mortgage Finance 4 Plc & Ors v Rizwan Hussain 2022-10-04
“…[1987] 1 WLR 1676 at 1683C per Nicholls LJ,…”
Cited — Ocado Group PLC & Anr v McKeeve 2021-02-08
“…ormation giving sufficient particularity of the alleged contempt to enable the alleged contemnor to meet the charges: see, for example, Harmsworth v Harmsworth [1987] 1 WLR 1676 at p. 1683 (per Nicholls LJ) and at p.1686-1687 (per Woolf LJ). As Nicholls LJ put it, the fundamental question is whether a reasonable person in the position …”