“…I set out Akenhead J’s conclusion at [28] of the judgment in full since it is referred to in the decision of this court in Elliott v Tinkler [2014] EWCA Civ 564, upon which Mr Metzer places reliance,…”
“…KJM and Tinkler v Elliott [2014] EWCA Civ 564 (“Tinkler”) do not assist Mr Deripaska. Both relate to public law contempt proceedings for which permission to proceed was required. By public law proceedings …”
“…d above) is one such authority. There are many others: see, for example, Berry Piling Systems Ltd v Sheer Projects Ltd [2013] EWHC 347 (TCC); Tinkler v Elliott [2014] EWCA Civ 564 at paragraph 44, per Gloster LJ.…”