How many times has [1989] 1 All ER 1033 been cited?

[1989] 1 All ER 1033 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1989] 1 All ER 1033

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Applied · 1

Applied — Piffs Elm Limited, R (on the application of) v Commission for Local Administration in England & Anor. 2023-05-10
“…(c). I accept Mr Coppel’s submission that the approach of the Divisional Court in R v Commissioner for Local Administration ex p Croydon London Borough Council [1989] 1 All ER 1033 is incorrect. Section 26(6)(c) is fundamental to the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. It applies at the start of an investigation but it continues to apply throughout…”
Cited — Philip Milburn, R (on the application of) v The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman 2023-02-28
“…Dicta of Woolf LJ in R v Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte Croydon London Borough Council [1989] 1 All ER 1033. Woolf LJ said that s 26(6) covers a situation where:…”
Cited — Solaria Energy UK Ltd v Department for Business, Energy And Industrial Strategy 2020-11-04
“… to me that the proper approach, having in mind Lord Woolf's observations [in R v Commissioner for Local Administration ex Parte Croydon London Borough Council [1989] 1 All ER 1033 at 1046] is that an absence of prejudice, so far as s.7(5)(b) is concerned is a highly material factor but is not of itself conclusive in favour of an extensio…”