How many times has [1989] 1 WLR 488 been cited?

[1989] 1 WLR 488 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1989] 1 WLR 488

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1989] 1 WLR 488

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins Assoc Ltd v Kingdom of Spain 2021-11-04
“…ion, the court will normally decide it, rather than treating it as a question of whether there is a good arguable case: E F Hutton & Co (London) Ltd v Mofarrij [1989] 1 WLR 488, 495; Chellaram v Chellaram (No. 2)[2002] 3 All ER 17, para 136.”…”
Cited — Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.P.A. & Ors 2019-05-14
“…diction, the court will normally decide it, rather than treating it as a question of whether there is a good arguable case: E F Hutton & Co (London) v Mofarrij [1989] 1 WLR 488, 495; Chellaram v Chellaram (No 2) [2002] 3 All ER 17, para 136.”…”
Cited — Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor (Rev 1) 2018-02-14
“…n, the court will normally decide it, rather than treating it as a question of whether there is a good arguable case: Hutton (EF) & Co (London) Ltd. v Mofarrij [1989] 1 WLR 488, 495 (CA); Chellaram v Chellaram (No 2) [2002] EWHC 632 (Ch), [2002] 3 All ER 17, [136].…”