- Cited — Vale SA v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor 2023-11-24
“…0 claim. The leading authorities are Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex [1987] AC 460 (“Spiliada”), AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Limited [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804(“Altimo”), and Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe UKSC 20, [2020] AC 1045 (“Lungowe”). All are referred to and analysed in the judge’s judgment.…”
- Cited — Crane Bank Limited & Ors v DFCU Bank Limited & Ors 2023-07-26
“…ping area, and accordingly was not suitable for determination on a summary basis: see Altimo Holdings and Investments Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804 per Lord Collins at [84]. At the hearing of the appeal Lord Pannick KC, for the appellants, advanced that contention only in relation to the Public Policy Exce…”
- Applied — Dr Craig Steven Wright & Ors v BTC Core (a partnership) & Ors 2023-07-20
“…s that the claim must have a real (as opposed to a fanciful) prospect of success: see Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobile Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71] (Lord Collins of Mapesbury). This requirement applies to each cause of action asserted in the claim.…”
- Cited — Tulip Trading Limited (a Seychelles company) v Wladimir Jasper van der Laan & Ors. 2023-02-03
“…anciful prospect of success, and is the same as the test for summary judgment (see e.g. AltimoHoldings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at paragraphs 71 and 82, Vedanta Resources v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [2020] AC 1045 at paragraph 42).…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor. v Koza Altin Işletmeleri AS 2022-10-07
“…[2012] 1 WLR 1804…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor. v Koza Altin Işletmeleri AS 2022-10-07
“…e principle enunciated by Lord Collins giving the judgment of the Privy Council in Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Limited [2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804 (“Altimo Holdings”) at [83] to [86], in particular at [84]:…”
- Cited — Koza Ltd & Anor. v Koza Altin Işletmeleri AS 2022-10-07
“…[2012] 1 WLR 1804…”
- Cited — Nokia Technologies OY & Anor. v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors. 2022-07-11
“… England is “clearly or distinctly the appropriate forum for the trial of the dispute” (Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7,[2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71] (Lord Collins of Mapesbury)). In the case of the English Defendants, the burden lies upon OPPO to show that another forum is more appropriate for the t…”
- Cited — Município de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor. 2022-07-08
“…[2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804,…”
- Cited — Fiona Lorraine Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC 2022-03-14
“… it is before the court then the court can do so. The judge also recognised (at [24]) the citation by the appellant of AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd[2012] 1 WLR 1804, at [84] in which the Privy Council held that (i) it is not normally appropriate to use a summary procedure for the determination of controversial questions of…”
- Explained — London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins Assoc Ltd v Kingdom of Spain 2021-11-04
“…The applicable principles are not in dispute. As explained in Altimo Holdings & Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd[2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71], a claimant must satisfy three requirements. First, there must be a serious issue to be tried on the merits of the claim. This is equated to the test f…”
- Cited — Manek & Ors v IIFL Wealth (UK) Ltd & Ors (2) 2021-05-04
“…foreign forum being promoted (in this case, India), the court must always bear in mind that the burden is on the Appellants: see Altimo Holdings v Kyrgyz Mobil [2012] 1 WLR 1804.…”
- Cited — Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v Celgard, LLC (Rev 1) 2020-10-09
“…Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71] (Lord Collins of Mapesbury).…”
- Followed — Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v Celgard, LLC (Rev 1) 2020-10-09
“…und in Lord Goff of Chieveley's famous speech in the Spiliada case [1987] AC 460, 475–484, summarised much more recently by Lord Collins JSC in the Altimo case [2012] 1 WLR 1804, para 88 as follows: ‘the task of the court is to identify the forum in which the case can be suitably tried for the interests of all the parties and for the e…”
- Cited — E D & F Man Capital Markets Ltd v Straits (Singapore) PTE Ltd 2019-11-26
“…[2012] 1 WLR 1804…”
- Cited — Lloyd v Google LLC 2019-10-02
“…The judge cited Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v. Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71], VTB Capital Plc v. Nutritek International Corp [2012] EWCA Civ 808 [2012] 2 Lloyd's Rep 313 at [99 - 101], and Vidal-Hall at [7].…”
- Explained — Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.P.A. & Ors 2019-05-14
“…fficiently arguable. This is well established, as Lord Collins of Mapesbury explained in Altimo Holdings & Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [81]:…”
- Explained — Eurasia Sports Ltd v Aguad 2018-07-24
“…he circumstances England is clearly or distinctly the appropriate forum for the trial of the dispute: see Altimo Holdings v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7; [2012] 1 WLR 1804 at [71] as explained in Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 1 WLR 192 at [7]. Each of those requirements remains in issue between the c…”
- Cited — Iiyama (UK) Limited & Ors. v Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. & Ors. 2018-02-16
“…e principles applicable to paragraph 3.1 of Practice Direction 6B were restated by the Privy Council in AK InvestmentCJSC v KyrgyzMobile Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804, at [71], [81] and [88], as summarised by the Court of Appeal in VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp [2012] EWCA Civ 808, [2012] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 313, a…”