- Approved — Hunt v Annolight Ltd 2021-11-10
“…Guidance as to how the wasted costs jurisdiction should be exercised is to be found in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205, approved by the House of Lords in Medcalf v Mardell [2002] UKHL 27, [2003] 1 AC 120. Sir Thomas Bingham MR, giving the judgment of the Court, said at 231 that…”
- Cited — Hunt v Annolight Ltd 2021-11-10
“…ot able to suggest a principled basis for any such absolute rule. He did, however, refer me to a passage in the judgment of the court in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205, 238–239, which reads:…”
- Cited — Gempride Ltd v Bamrah & Anor 2018-06-21
“… through statute and rules of court, is helpfully set out in the judgment of the Court of Appeal, delivered by Sir Thomas Bingham MR, in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205 (“Ridehalgh”). I need not repeat it here. Suffice it to say that the current basis under which a court may disallow, or order a representative to meet, “wasted…”