“…ion of Article 9 is ultimately a matter for the courts. Lord Browne-Wilkinson, giving the judgment of the Privy Council in Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321, explained at p.332 that:…”
“…in Parliament to prove what was said or done in Parliament as a matter of historical fact where this is uncontentious: see Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321, at 337…”
“…is the Member of Parliament who is defending himself against an action for defamation arising from privileged material. In Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 a television programme transmitted by the defendant alleged that a Minister in the New Zealand Government had secretly conspired to promote sales of assets to …”
“…be 40 years ago. The second is based on the constitutional limits of the court's competence as against that of Parliament: Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321. The distinctive feature of all these cases is that once the forbidden area is identified, the court may not adjudicate on the matters within it, even if it is…”