- Cited — Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2021-02-18
“…he Report of the Joint Committee on Parliamentary Privilege (Session 1998-99), chaired by Lord Nicholls, which was cited by Lord Bingham in Buchanan v Jennings [2005] 1 AC 115 at [16], concluded that “the practice in court is for both the applicants and the government to use the official reports of both Houses to indicate what is the…”
- Cited — Foreign And Commonwealth Office v Warsama & Anor 2020-02-11
“… infringe article 9 even if the effect of that challenge would be to show, by a side wind, that what was said in Parliament was untrue: see Buchanan v Jennings [2005] 1 AC 115, per Lord Bingham at para. 13. The same issues of wrongdoing that are addressed in a report laid before Parliament may later form the subject of disciplinary, …”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“…ealt with this point when giving the advice of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Buchanan v Jennings (Attorney General of New Zealand intervening) [2005] 1 AC 115, para 13:…”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“….” As Lord Bingham is recorded as having pointed out in Buchanan v Jennings (Attorney General of New Zealand intervening) [2005] 1 AC 115 at [46] of the Chaytor case, it makes no difference whether the repetition of what was said in Parliament is merely by reference. However, it is not necessary …”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“…ly been found: see the comprehensive review of those cases by Lord Bingham in Buchanan v Jennings (Attorney General of New Zealand intervening) [2004] UKPC 36; [2005] 1 AC 115 (in which it was held that, where an MP had said outside Parliament that he did not resile from a statement he had made in Parliament, he had adopted and confi…”