How many times has [1998] AC 20 been cited?

[1998] AC 20 is cited by 5 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1998] AC 20

· cited by 5 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1998] AC 20

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 5

Cited — Vadim Don Benyatov v Credit Suisse (Securities) Europe Ltd 2023-02-17
“…1997] UKHL 23, [1998] AC 20. That entire structure would be redundant if the Claimant’s submission were correct.…”
Cited — London Borough of Lambeth v Agoreyo 2019-03-05
“…Lord Steyn’s judgment in Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation) [1998] AC 20 recognised the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, which is implied into every contract of employment. At p.45 Lord Steyn said that an employer shall …”
Cited — Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2018-05-01
“…[1998] AC 20…”
Cited — Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2018-05-01
“…seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust between employer and employee: see, for example, Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1998] AC 20, 34H-35D (Lord Nicholls) and 45C-46E (Lord Steyn). I shall refer to this as ‘the implied term of trust and confidence’.…”
Cited — United First Partners Research v Carreras 2018-02-28
“…at [1997] UKHL 23, [1998] AC 20, at p. 34 A-B)…”