- Cited — Re C & Ors (Care Proceedings: Adequacy of Reasons) 2023-03-30
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409 and first adopted in family cases in…”
- Explained — Quantum Care Limited & Anor. v Lalit Modi 2023-02-21
“…r which weighed with the judge in his appraisal of the evidence has to be identified and explained” (English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409, at paragraph 20, per Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the Court). Seventhly, the Judge can, I think, be seen to have gone too far in paragraph 82 of the …”
- Considered — Kaitey (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-12-10
“…consider setting out fuller reasons in relation to this argument, in accordance with English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd (Practice Note) [2002] EWCA Civ 605; [2002] 1 WLR 2409. In any event, he submits, the Judge did in substance address the point: she repeatedly cited Khadir, including, at para. 27, the precise proposition now relie…”
- Doubted — All Answers Ltd v W & Anor 2021-04-30
“…uirements set out in the judgment in Meek v City of Birmingham District Council [1987] IRLR 250 and English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd. [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409) and the EAT did not have doubts as to the adequacy of the employment tribunal’s reasoning;…”
- Cited — Cuciurean v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor 2021-03-16
“…he right course would have been to ask the Judge for further reasons and/or to appeal on that ground: English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605 [2002] 1 WLR 2409. That has not been done.…”
- Cited — OH (Algeria) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-10-24
“…cision. They need not be elaborate … there is no duty … to deal with every argument presented…” See English v Emery Reimbold and Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605 [2002] 1 WLR 2409. The FtT did so.…”
- Applied — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“…y be the cut-off point. If a judge is asked, in accordance with the guidance given in English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd (Practice Note) [2002] EWCA Civ 605 [2002] 1 WLR 2409, as applied to family cases in In re A [2012] 1 WLR 595, to elaborate his reasoning and in doing so realises that his original decision was wrong, should he no…”
- Cited — Simetra Global Assets Ltd & Anor v Ikon Finance Ltd & Ors 2019-08-09
“…This approach was affirmed in English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409, where it was held that English common law on this issue was consistent with the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Giving t…”
- Cited — Staechelin & Ors v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd & Ors 2019-05-14
“…tters that are not disputed. It is sufficient if what he says shows the basis on which he has acted: English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409; Fage at [115]. Where there is a conflict of fact between witnesses, it may be enough for the judge to say that one witness was preferred to another because he…”
- Cited — London Borough of Lambeth v Agoreyo 2019-03-05
“…s not set out the reasons for a determination in relation to key issues is fundamentally flawed: see English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605; [2002] 1 WLR 2409, at para. 19 (Lord Phillips MR, with whom Latham and Arden LJJ agreed). However, at the hearing before us, Mr Allen made clear that this is not a reasons chall…”
- Cited — AS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-02-21
“…unal the relevant question under the procedure endorsed by this Court, as regards appeals from the High Court, in English v Emery Reimbold [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409, and again in the context of appeals from an employment tribunal in Barke v Seetec Business Technology Centre Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 578, [2005] ICR 1373 – “the E…”
- Cited — A (Children) 2019-02-01
“…We were referred to English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2409 and to Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [2014] EWCA Civ 5 but it is not necessary to cite any passages from those decisions.…”
- Cited — Winter v Hockley Mint Ltd 2018-11-15
“… every argument presented. It is sufficient if what he or she says shows the parties the basis on which he/she acted: see English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2409 at [6] and [17].…”
- Cited — VC, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2018-02-02
“…[2002] EWCA Civ. 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409. These failures made our…”