How many times has [1999] 2 FLR 745 been cited?

[1999] 2 FLR 745 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1999] 2 FLR 745

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1999] 2 FLR 745

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Mark Austin v Christina Haynes 2021-12-15
“…ng as being equivalent to an order” because it was “an integral part of the order”; H v H, as referred to above; and N v N (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement)[1999] 2 FLR 745. In N v N, Wall J, as he then was, treated this as an established principle, when he said, at pp. 755/756:…”
Cited — Moher v Moher 2019-08-21
“… the order meant that he would be unable to obtain or grant a valid Get. In support of this submission he relied on N v N (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) [1999] 2 FLR 745.…”