“…69]-[71]. The test is one of necessity, and what this means is that the implication must be “compellingly clear”: B (A Minor) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 2 AC 428 per Lord Nicholls at p. 463-464; Pwr v Director of Public Prosecutions [2022] UKSC 2 [2022] 1 WLR 789 per Lords Hamblen and Burrows JJSC and Lady Arden at [34]…”