- Cited — Excalibur & Keswick Groundworks Ltd v Michael McDonald 2023-01-17
“…would be an affront to the court to permit him to continue to prosecute his claim, then the claim may be struck out for that reason. In the Arrow Nominees case [2000] 2 BCLC 167, the misconduct lay in the petitioner’s persistent and flagrant fraud whose object was to frustrate a fair trial. The question whether it is appropriate to str…”
- Cited — Excalibur & Keswick Groundworks Ltd v Michael McDonald 2023-01-17
“…conduct by the claimant or other party which makes the conduct of a fair trial and therefore a judgment on the merits practically impossible. In Arrow Nominees [2000] 2 BCLC 167 where the petition was struck out the forgery of the disclosed documents coupled with the petitioner’s own false evidence made it impossible for the trial judg…”
- Followed — TMO Renewables Limited (in liquidation) v Timothy Stephen Kenneth Yeo & Ors 2022-10-28
“…igation, the general rule that costs follow the event is thereby wholly displaced. I leave on one side cases such as Molloy and Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2000] 2 BCLC 167, where the conduct in question is so grave that the entire case of the party can properly be described as amounting to an abuse of process. In such cases it is…”
- Cited — Hughes Jarvis Ltd vSearle & Anor 2019-01-15
“…the earlier case of Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2000] 2 BCLC 167 (“Arrow Nominees”). Both concerned cases where the claimant had engaged in fraud and forgery to an extent which was said to make a fair trial impossible. In Ma…”
- Cited — Hughes Jarvis Ltd vSearle & Anor 2019-01-15
“…Arrow Nominees case [2000] 2 BCLC 167…”
- Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“…The Court of Appeal referred extensively to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Arrow Nominees Inc v Blackledge [2000] 2 BCLC 167 and held, at para 71, that it was authority for the proposition that, where a claimant is guilty of misconduct in relation to proceedings which is so serious t…”