- Cited — Mercy Global Consult Limited (in liquidation) v Abayomi Adegbuyi-Jackson & Ors 2023-10-04
“…In Regina (Kadhim) v Brent London Borough Council Housing Benefit Review Board [2001] QB 955 the Court of Appeal held thata subsequent court is not bound by a proposition of law which, although part of the ratio of an earlier decision, had been assumed…”
- Explained — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…d to be correct, but which was not argued, is the subject of comprehensive discussion in R (Kadhim) v Brent London Borough Council Housing Benefit Review Board [2001] QB 955. At [21] and [22] Buxton LJ explained that there were several ways in which a proposition of law could become part of the ratio of a case in the sense that it …”
- Cited — Fiona George v Linda Cannell & Anor 2022-07-27
“…er court and had not been the subject of argument before or consideration by that court: R (Kadhim) v Brent London Borough Council Housing Benefit Review Board [2001] QB 955, 965-966 (CA).…”
- Cited — Nicholas Eckland v Chief Constable of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary 2022-01-07
“…[2000] EWCA Civ 344, [2001] QB 955,…”
- Cited — Genentech Inc. v The Comptroller General of Patents 2020-03-31
“…In support of her second submission, Miss May relied on R (Kadhim) v Brent London Borough Council Housing Benefit Review Board [2001] QB 955. The issue in that case was whether the applicant was residing with a close relative and thus not entitled to housing benefit under the applicable housing legi…”
- Cited — FSHC Group Holdings Ltd v Glas Trust Corporation Ltd (Rev 1) 2019-07-31
“…See also R (Kadhim) v Brent London Borough Council [2001] QB 955, para 33; Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA v SFO (No2) [2014] EWCA Civ 1129; [2015] 1 WLR 797, para 43.…”
- Approved — Youngsam, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board & Anor 2019-02-27
“…In R (Kadhim) v Brent LBC [2001] QB 955 Buxton LJ approved the statement of Professor Cross in Cross and Harris, Precedent in English Law (4th edition) 1991 page 72, namely;…”
- Followed — Youngsam, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board & Anor 2019-02-27
“… the following statement in Cross and Harris on Precedent in English Law (4th edn, 1991) at 72, which was said by the Court of Appeal in R (Kadhim) v Brent LBC [2001] QB 955, 961, to provide “the clearest and most persuasive guidance” on the proper way of determining the ratio of a case:…”